The Impossible Trisection

60° TRISECTION MADE POSSIBLE. 

The chasm between 60° and 20° angles was thought to be so wide that after two millennia of failing to bridge it, Euclidean angle trisection was finally written off by mathematical theory back in the 1830s. The claim was that trisection had been solved by proving it was mathematically impossible. But many trisection diehards soldiered on, and those who assailed mathematicians with drawings were routinely dismissed out-of-hand. Despite its deep influence on mathematics, no one would take the question of trisection seriously again. 

I became one of those diehards. I couldn't agree that even the most rigorous mathematics could account for all the variables or prove impossibility. So I toiled on the problem and thought I'd nailed it a few years ago, but was off by a few hundredths of a degree after testing with better software. But in the process, I'd grown to appreciate geometry and persisted, this time using GeoGebra's interactive geometry software. Not really expecting to find a solution, I did so for the enjoyment of learning. Besides, getting it wrong was always the right answer, because after all, it was impossible.

The other day, though, I got to pondering the difference between a third of a 60° angle's chord, which was constructible, and that of its arc. The objective of bridging the difference became a matter of blazing a path using tools of perpendiculars, parallels, bisectors, arcs, and mainly, linear thirds. Starting with a third of the angle's chord naturally led to the perpendicular and its intersection with the arc. Then arcing back to the difference led to placement of thirds in tandem, ending up at a microscopic triangular structure of two arcs and a line the size of a bacterium, visible only by computer. A point was placed at a linear third within the microscopic structure. Measuring it back to the vertex of the 60° angle, I couldn't believe it—a clean 20°—it worked! I had trisected the 60° angle.

But if the mathematical impossibility theory lingers, please consider that my trisection employs computer-assisted construction able to display microscopic structures invisible to the naked eye, unnoticed through millennia and unanticipated in the 1830s. And that operations surrounding the proportion of a chord segment to its arc using linear thirds were not addressed by the impossibility theory. With the application of digital computation, the construction clearly produces a 20° angle to fifteen decimal places, one third of 60°. So with quadrillion-to-one certainty, Euclidean trisection of a 60° angle has been achieved. 

As it turns out, the chasm between 60° and 20° wasn't impossibly wide at all, but all that time had been so small it was just impossible to see. 

The trisection may appear messy on the macro scale, but is beautiful in the microscopic view of its endpoint (right).
 


Verification: The constructed trisecting angle (Point U) compared to GeoGebra's "Angle with Given Size" (Point G'). Both points fall on the same angle arm in a magnified view & both measure exactly the same. 
   

I've made videos demonstrating the trisection steps-by-step and encourage you to try it in GeoGebra or other software. You might find geometry enjoyable, too. And by the way, squaring the circle is still up for grabs.  


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

60° Trisection Goes Big!

Image
Magnified Details of the 60° Trisection— I found a way to trisect a 60° angle with Euclidean construction simulated on a computer using GeoGebra's interactive geometry software. The software allows a user to zoom into the construction and create minute structures, which under the rules, any size is acceptable. GeoGebra's drawing board displays Cartesian coordinates, which in the following examples were defined as centimeters to provide a sense of scale. The original objective of the construction was to define length disparity from one third of the primary angle's chord to that of its arc, so this isn't angle trisection per se , but trisection of the angle's arc, which also defines the angle. The construction employs a sequence of three linear thirds to reach the goal.  With the 60° primary angle having a base width of 14 cm, the construction culminates with operations executed within a cluster of three intersections grouped smaller than a single E coli bacterium, an...
Read more

Diffraction Iridescence

Image
"Truth may best be found at the cusp, where waves crash and colorful pebbles wash ashore."    This study began as a deep dive into image degradation due to small aperture diffraction. When the ragged edge of raw light was explored through long-extension macro imaging, these astonishing colors appeared. At the Edge of Light: Macro image of 0.01" (0.254mm) graduations on a stainless steel machinist rule (inset at lower left corner). 10.66:1 macro ratio on Olympus OM-D E-M1II using 38mm f/2.8 OM Auto-Macro 1/8sec f/2.8 ISO320 w/ 405mm bellows. Not noise, but colorful diffraction iridescence coaxed from the metal's fine granular surface. The magnified ring is approximately 0.004" (0.1mm or 100,000nm) on the ruler.    An Iridescent Penny Saved: Macro image of 2022 US One Cent adjacent to the date numerals. Olympus OM-D E-M1II using 38mm f/2.8 OM Zuiko Auto-Macro 1/2sec f/2.8 ISO320 w/ 412mm Bellows, 10.8:1 macro ratio on original M4/3 image. Note the colorful, Air...
Read more